Applying for Accreditation | MISSION 10X ECOSYSTEM FOR HEALTHCARE

Who is applying

We need to know who stands behind the claim. Accreditation is awarded to a named solution held by a named legal entity, and the attestation at the end is a personal one.

Applicant

Legal entity name *

Country of incorporation *

Year incorporated

Website

Type of applicant *

The solution

Solution name *

Version assessed

In one sentence a non-expert could follow, what does it do? *

If you cannot say it simply here, it usually is not clear yet. Avoid jargon.

Who we speak to

Your name *

Your role *

Email *

Phone

Do you have any commercial, advisory, equity or family relationship with a Mission10X principal, partner or advisory board member? *

Declaring a relationship does not disqualify you. Failing to declare one does.

No Yes

Choose one.

What you are claiming

Claim only what you can evidence. Reviewers verify every category you tick, and an unsupported claim in one category weakens the whole submission.

Award sought

Which award are you aiming at? *

Platinum. A 10X improvement in more than one category. Gold. A 10X improvement in a single category. Composite 10X. Improvements across several categories that together reach 10X. Emerging 10X. Evidenced 10X potential where a prerequisite such as regulatory clearance or a second site is still outstanding. Not sure. Tell us where we land.

Choose one.

Categories claimed

Leave a category blank if you are not claiming it. Multiple categories are allowed and can be awarded together: the first is covered by the accreditation fee, each additional category carries a supplementary fee.

Claim at least one category.

Your strongest claim

Reviewers start here. Pick the single category where your evidence is hardest to argue with, and give us the underlying numbers rather than the multiple.

Which category do you most want to be judged on? *

Name the standard of care or process you are compared against *

A multiple with no named baseline is not assessable. Name the current pathway, device, test or workflow you displace.

Before: value and unit *

After: value and unit *

Sample size (n)

Is that figure measured or modelled? *

Measured Modelled Both

Choose one.

Period the data covers

Why is this your strongest claim? *

Evidence

Mission10X does not accredit on self-published material alone. At least one piece of supporting evidence must come from outside your own organisation.

The evidence behind your strongest claim

What kind of evidence is it? *

Peer-reviewed publication Prospective trial, published or not Retrospective analysis of real-world data Funded pilot with a formal evaluation Internal analysis only

Choose one.

Who produced it? *

We did The customer did An independent third party

Choose one.

Link to the source document

A publication DOI, a shared link, or a customer report. Leave blank if it is confidential and we will arrange access.

The customer gate

Can you evidence the claim from at least one provider or payor customer? *

This is a hard gate. The voice of the client or the payor has to be in the evidence somewhere.

Yes No

Choose one.

How many named reference sites could speak to the result? *

None One Two or more

Choose one.

Do you consent to us contacting them to verify the claim? *

Yes Not yet, but we will arrange it No

Choose one.

Eligibility

These are the gates every solution has to clear, whatever the size of the impact. Answer honestly: “in progress” with a credible date routes you to Emerging 10X, which is a real award. A gap we discover later ends the application.

We do not duplicate other assessmentsMission10X accepts NHS DTAC, a NICE ESF tier, a DiGA listing and FDA clearance as evidence in these gates. If you hold one, say so and we will count it.

Bias and equity

Where does the solution stand on bias? *

Tested, and no material bias was found Tested, bias found, mitigation in place Not material to the population it serves Not yet tested

Choose one.

Method note *

How you tested, or why bias is not material here. For any solution using AI or machine learning this is mandatory and reviewers read it closely.

Which populations has it been validated in?

Geography, income setting, age range, and any group where you know it performs less well. Naming a limitation builds credibility here rather than damaging it.

Adoption readiness

A result that cannot survive a busy ward is not an accreditable result. Six things stop good solutions from scaling, and Mission10X assesses all six. Most applications that fail, fail here rather than on impact.

Real-world deployment

Average time from contract signature to go-live

Workflow

Does it run inside the clinical workflow in at least one production deployment? *

Embedded in the EHR, or reachable by single sign-on with no duplicate data entry. Workflow friction is the most cited reason new tools die in hospitals.

Yes, embedded in the EHR Yes, single sign-on with no duplicate entry Partly. Some duplicate entry remains No. It runs as a separate system Not applicable to this solution

Choose one.

Named EHR or platform partners and integration method

Money

Can you produce a five-year total cost of ownership, including integration, change management and support? *

Procurement rejects on total cost of ownership, not list price. No total cost of ownership, no consideration.

Yes Partly. List price only No

Choose one.

Name the funding or reimbursement route in at least one target territory *

A CPT or HCPCS code, an NHS tariff, a DiGA listing, a private payor policy, or a named line in a provider budget. “We are exploring options” is a no.

Integration and change

Which open standards does the solution conform to?

Lock-in is anti-adoption. Health systems will not buy something they cannot integrate or leave.

Do you give new sites a written implementation playbook? *

Yes, published Yes, internal only No

Choose one.

What has to change at an adopting site for this to work?

Team restructuring, retraining, a new clinical pathway, or nothing much. Be straight with us. A large change burden is not disqualifying if the benefit justifies it and you have a playbook.

Declarations

Read these properly. They are the basis on which we assess, and on which an award can later be withdrawn.

List every figure in this application that is projected or modelled rather than measured *

If every figure is measured, write “none”. This is the question that separates fact from forecast, and answering it well counts in your favour.

Anything else we should know?

Attestations

What happens nextYou will get an acknowledgement by email straight away. A reviewer comes back to you within 10 working days with one of three answers: an invitation to submit a full dossier, a set of clarifying questions, or a written no with the reason and what would change it. We do not leave applicants guessing.

Check and submit

Read it back. Once you submit, this is the version a reviewer sees.

One last lookIs every number here one you would defend in front of a clinician, a chief financial officer and a payor in the same room? If not, fix it now rather than in the review.

✓

Application received

We have emailed an acknowledgement to the address you gave. A reviewer will come back to you within 10 working days with an invitation to submit a full dossier, clarifying questions, or a written no with the reason.

Return to mission10x.net

Initial screening

Who is applying

Applicant

The solution

Who we speak to

What you are claiming

Award sought

Categories claimed

Your strongest claim

Evidence

The evidence behind your strongest claim

The customer gate

Eligibility

Bias and equity

Adoption readiness

Real-world deployment

Workflow

Money

Integration and change

Declarations

Attestations

Check and submit

Application received